AWS Migration Readiness Assessment (MRA): What It Is and How to Run One
What an AWS Migration Readiness Assessment covers, the six Cloud Adoption Framework perspectives, how to run one, and what to do with the results.
An AWS Migration Readiness Assessment (MRA) is a structured review of how prepared an organization is to move workloads to AWS. It finds strengths and gaps before migration work starts, and it ends with an action plan to close those gaps. AWS describes it as the assessment step of a migration, ahead of the mobilize and migrate phases.
Quick answer: run a readiness assessment before you commit to dates or budgets. Score your readiness across business, people, governance, platform, security and operations, list the gaps, and fix the critical ones before moving production data.
What an MRA is
AWS Prescriptive Guidance defines a migration readiness assessment as a process for learning how far along an organization is in its cloud journey, understanding its current strengths and weaknesses, and building an action plan to close the gaps. The AWS approach uses the AWS Cloud Adoption Framework (AWS CAF) and its six perspectives so the review covers more than servers and databases.
AWS expects three outcomes from a readiness review:
- An understanding of where the organization is in its cloud journey
- Identified strengths and weaknesses from a cloud-readiness point of view
- An action plan to resolve the gaps so migration does not stall to fix foundational problems later
Teams often also gain alignment between stakeholders and a shorter list of roadblocks.
The six perspectives
The AWS CAF perspectives are business, people, governance, platform, security and operations. The questions below are typical examples of what each one looks at. They are illustrative, not AWS's official question list.
| Perspective | What it looks at | Example question |
|---|---|---|
| Business | Goals, business case, funding, executive sponsorship | Why are we migrating, and how will we know it worked? |
| People | Skills, roles, training, change management | Who will run this environment after cutover, and are they trained? |
| Governance | Program ownership, cost control, risk management, decision rights | Who approves cutover, and who watches spending? |
| Platform | Target architecture, landing zone, workload inventory, dependencies | Do we know every server, database and integration that must move? |
| Security | Identity, access, data protection, logging, compliance | Which data is sensitive, and how will it be protected in transit and at rest? |
| Operations | Monitoring, incident response, backup and recovery | If the migrated system fails at 2 a.m., who is alerted and what do they do? |
What an assessment produces
The output is a picture of readiness by perspective and a prioritized list of gaps with owners. Some consultancies present this as a heatmap or radar chart, but the format matters less than the action list. A useful result names specific gaps, such as "no tested restore" or "no named owner for rollback decisions", instead of a generic score.
How to run one
- Set the scope. Decide which workloads, teams and environments the assessment covers. A single application needs a lighter review than a data center exit.
- Gather the right people. Include business, IT, security, operations and the application owners. Gaps often sit between teams.
- Answer each perspective with evidence. "We have backups" is an opinion. "The last restore test succeeded on this date" is evidence.
- Score honestly. Treat "not sure" as a gap, not a pass.
- Rank the gaps. Put safeguards that could stop a migration or cause data loss first: inventory, tested backups, a rollback plan and operational readiness.
- Turn gaps into an action plan with owners and dates, then reassess before scheduling cutover.
Enterprise MRA or a lighter check?
The AWS MRA framing is built for organizations planning migration at scale. If you are moving one application or a handful of servers, a full six-perspective program review may be more than you need. In that case the practical questions are narrower: do you have an inventory, a restore-tested backup, a data plan, a validation method, a cutover approach, a rollback plan and operational ownership?
CloudSyncPK's free migration readiness assessment is a lighter, workload-level check. It is ten questions across discovery, data, application, cutover and operations, and it flags four critical safeguards regardless of the overall score. It is a planning aid, not the official AWS MRA, and it does not replace a review of your actual environment.
What to do after the assessment
Fix the critical gaps first, then build the migration plan: workload inventory, approach per workload, migration waves, data validation, cutover runbook and rollback triggers. The AWS migration checklist walks through those preparation steps in order. Confirm that recovery is proven before any move by reviewing AWS backup best practices.
If you would rather have the assessment and plan done with you, the AWS cloud migration service covers discovery, migration waves, cutover and rollback planning.
Verify with AWS
- Evaluating migration readiness (AWS Prescriptive Guidance)
- Assess phase of an AWS migration
- AWS Cloud Adoption Framework
The practical takeaway
A migration readiness assessment is cheap insurance. It turns "we think we are ready" into a list of evidenced strengths and named gaps before production data moves. Use the full AWS-style review for large programs and a focused workload check for smaller moves, and treat missing backups, rollback and operations as blockers either way.
Related reading: AWS Migration Checklist, Migration Readiness Assessment tool, AWS Multi-AZ vs Multi-Region
Related Services
Want a second opinion on your setup?
Book a free AWS audit — no obligation, no credentials required.